// open-source explorer

Decisions open-source code could run on Jev.

LLM calls in public repos that only return a label, a yes/no or a score, and what each could save in cost and time on TypeSafe Jev. Percentages only: traffic is unknown, and it cancels out of a percentage.

1,035public repos scanned
154with decision calls in production code
348decision calls found
44% · 3.5×median cost cut and speedup per decision call

Data as of 2026-10-05; prices and latency from OpenRouter. Where the code names its model and every field maps to Jev, the median is 58%; where the model is chosen at runtime, it's 41% against the least favourable likely model. How we calculate this · Download the data

// every repo

All repos with decision calls.

Well-known and less-known repos alike. Typical saving is the median across a repo's calls.

Sort by
RepoStarsCallsTypical saving
ariso-ai/ivan521
99%
kapoorankush/litclock661
99%
sepfazeli/due-diligence-rag141
98%
Superior-Trade/trading-terminal3421
98%
lilinji/GeneTind-Life-Skills142
98%
Othmane-Khadri/YALC-the-GTM-operating-system3162
97%
Jellypod-Inc/cartoon-studio1213
97%
worldalliance/alliance101
97%
gauntletai-p4-pointer/foto-fun265
97%
firecrawl/grok-4-fire-enrich511
96%
eersnington/diff0231
96%
RetainDB/RetainDB571
96%
Connectry-io/connectrylab-architect-cert-mcp362
95%
llSourcell/mathvoice201
95%
kristianeboe/swipestats.io91
94%
ZealynxSecurity/krait231
94%
stakwork/stakgraph1103
94%
Codehagen/Autoselll1122
94%
typper-io/crust101
94%
ayuer/OptionFinder92
93%
anymorph-ai/context-bench142
93%
fixadev/fixa-observe881
93%
firecrawl/fire-enrich1.3k1
93%
timothywarner-org/claude-architect902
92%
TranBaVinhSon/open-manus562
92%
CharlesQ9/HistAgent533
92%
whitew1994WW/email_research_assistant281
92%
KattyFury/Binance-Agent171
91%
HarimxChoi/google-surf-mcp2911
90%
GreamDesu/OpenDeepArxiv262
90%
different-ai/irs-agent252
89%
aravindpranav/job-agent402
88%
HomenShum/NodeBenchAI144
87%
omer182/OverseerAgent321
83%
3SVS/simsa178
83%
meiotoufa/DR-Rubric254
81%
polarsource/polar10.3k4
73%
elizaOS/eliza19.4k1
68%
tridant-io/owlette321
58%
unxversal/c3d162
58%
firecrawl/open-lovable28.6k1
57%
inite-ai/inite-brain-service418
55%
r-muresan/automated513
55%
TeneBrae93/HackSmarter_Swarm761
54%
rxtech-lab/hk-transportation-mcp81
53%
provos/ironcurtain6132
52%
watt-mind/coach953
52%
jorge-menjivar/super-agents431
49%
activepieces/activepieces24.9k1
48%
jay-sahnan/signal3153
48%
cacheplane/threadplane651
48%
hotsuliakk/agentic-rag481
48%
sunnysavita10/doctor-appoitment-multiagent291
48%
RSametSamyeli/prompt-to-mobile-app-design101
48%
hnu-vis/TSPilot91
48%
kushalBanda/AI-Engineer91
48%
getmaxun/maxun17.7k2
48%
Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm66.7k1
48%
drivly/ai381
47%
autarch-dev/autarch272
47%
jesseduffield/ai-battlegrounds312
47%
subhadeeproy3902/cndocs251
44%
HKUDS/LightRAG40.0k1
44%
HUST-AI-HYZ/MemoryAgentBench4621
44%
theexperiencecompany/gaia3061
44%
lzlfwow/PatentClaw1101
44%
AQ-MedAI/MedMemoryBench761
44%
trustbit/erc3-agents472
44%
mesutdmn/Autonomous-Multi-Agent-Systems-with-CrewAI-Essay-Writer461
44%
muxx/bitgn-ecom1-exoskeleton443
44%
mahm/softwaredesign-llm-application361
44%
stanford-oval/sliders3115
44%
steelydylan/gut-cli291
44%
hepai-lab/hepai121
44%
ratel-ai/ratel-bench121
44%
XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code13.6k1
43%
studie-tech/TheNinjaRPG1042
42%
awslabs/threat-designer2912
41%
drfccv/deer-flow-cn2002
41%
redmadrobot-rnd/dcd113
40%
BasaltHQ/crm-official1315
40%
ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks7323
39%
vibrantlabsai/ragas15.9k2
39%
Arvo-AI/aurora4313
39%
sjtu-sai-agents/X-Master3221
39%
EuniAI/ContextBench1455
39%
Blackoutta/ai-engineer-training14311
39%
get-convex/convex-evals1281
39%
tangxiangru/Eigen-1941
39%
Harmeet10000/AgentNexus-LangChain-FastAPI503
39%
mintlify/index481
39%
activeloopai/hle_with_tools111
39%
Akrasia0/liz292
37%
open-mercato/open-mercato1.8k4
34%
BasedHardware/omi13.5k8
33%
google/artemis11.0k3
33%
FusionBrainLab/gigaevo-core1283
33%
modelguide/modelguide1071
33%
openai/openai-knowledge-retrieval981
33%
osnHQ/ethosai121
33%
cypherpepe/elizaOS1013
33%
wishonia/wishonia83
33%
growthxai/output4391
31%
orq-ai/evaluatorq211
30%
maevsi/vibetype432
30%
firecrawl/firecrawl188.8k2
27%
567-labs/instructor14.0k1
27%
kunwarVivek/mcp-github-project-manager1018
27%
iamarunbrahma/vision-parse4842
24%
alramalho/self-tracking-software332
23%
CaptainCrouton89/.claude4954
18%
project-89/argOS384
18%
allenai/olmocr19.7k1
17%
tercumantanumut/selene1691
17%
asteasolutions/tapestry-project121
17%
infoslack/mentoria-ia-2025437
17%
masamasa59/genai-agent-advanced-book2084
17%
wds1996/Tiny-Agent112
15%
mouad-bounfil/Ai-Agents492
15%
firecrawl/firegeo6631
13%
piyushgarg-dev/genai-cohort2131
11%
CodeLabsAI29/Inbox_OS122
10%
midday-ai/midday15.1k2
8%
jaumpedro214/posts761
7%
kennethleungty/Handoffs-in-LangGraph-Multi-Agent-Systems131no saving
buffer121328/vibe-coding-and-agents156no saving
resaro-ai/drone_vlm_golden_eval91no saving
csupenn/TopFlow141no saving
Y-66/AdaptiveRAG102no saving
latchfield/vulcan-core181no saving
KATT/trpc-ai-playground231no saving
GLambard/MDxApp341no saving
Hendrixer/agents-production901no saving
FNBIP/aegis-osint-map321no saving
piyushgarg-dev/genai-cohort-2.01021no saving
imbjdd/hackathonatlas.com191no saving
Lakshay1509/NeatMail1456no saving
infoslack/curso-ia904no saving
au-clan/cachesaver301no saving
Mail-0/Zero10.8k1no saving
exa-labs/exa-hallucination-detector3322no saving
brightdata/pepolehub3271no saving
lantos1618/github.gg981no saving
Hormold/tiktok-warmup631no saving
Rai220/gigachain_telegram_bot357no saving
revokslab/mentor.ai341no saving
lisstasy/Receipt_Scanner281no saving
CodinjaoftheWorld/agentic-ai-sdlc-hitl-langgraph152no saving
Draichi/formula1-AI131no saving
entbappy/AgentWriter-AI92no saving
JohnZolton/patense-local81no saving
mizuki0x/kamiyo-protocol81no saving
victorverma3/Letterboxd-Movie-Recommendations331no saving
founder-srm/Founders-website121no saving

// methodology

How we calculate this.

Static estimates from each call's source, list prices and public latency stats. A shadow run on real traffic measures the real numbers.

llm_cost = (prompt_tokens + state_tokens) * llm_price_in + output_tokens * llm_price_out jev_cost = (jev_request_tokens + state_factor * state_tokens) * jev_price_in (Jev output tokens are free) reduction_all_jev = 1 - jev_cost / llm_cost
  • state_tokens (the user input each call sends) is unknown from source, so each figure is a range over 50-2000 tokens; the same count is used on both sides.
  • prompt_tokens counts prompt text the scanner resolves statically: literals and constants, including ones imported from other modules or through tsconfig path aliases, without interpolated input. Prompts built at runtime or read from files are missed (promptInSource: false). Jev's questions carry the same prompt text, so its cost includes it.
  • output_tokens is the smallest JSON the schema allows. Reasoning tokens, schema/tool definitions, tool-use system prompts and chat framing are left out of llm_cost, so llm_cost is a lower bound and the reduction is conservative.
  • jev_request_tokens = 259 + 31 per question, and state_factor = 0.71: Jev's billed input tokens, fitted from 45 live Jev calls on 2026-09-24 (jev-swap oss measure-jev).
  • Prices are list prices from OpenRouter (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models, fetched 2026-09-24); Jev's from its OpenRouter page. Calls whose model can't be read or isn't listed there are shown but left out of totals.
  • Only production code counts. Calls in tests, examples/demos/samples/docs/cookbooks/templates, evals/benchmarks/scripts/experiments, and in repositories that are sample collections are left out.
  • Calls that also return free-text fields Jev can't produce are 'partial-swap' and left out of totals: the LLM call would still be needed.
  • Absolute dollars are never shown: traffic volume is unknown, and it cancels out of a percentage.
  • Speed: the LLM's time for a call is estimated as OpenRouter's p50 latency plus output tokens / p50 throughput, from the model's busiest provider on its OpenRouter page (a 30-minute window at fetch time). Jev is taken at 327 ms, its p50 over 45 live calls measured end to end on 2026-09-24 (TypeSafe reports 70-500 ms).
  • Verdicts: 'cheaper' when Jev is at least 5% cheaper at the low end of the input range; 'about the same cost, faster' when within 15% of the LLM's cost and at least 1.5× faster; otherwise no saving.
  • Calls whose model is chosen at runtime are compared with likely models: ones the same repo names in its other decision calls, else the provider's small default models (data/reference-models.json: hand-picked, not usage data), which are also the cheapest, so the savings shown are the conservative ones. Only models where Jev is cheaper, or about the same cost and faster, are shown; these conditional figures stay out of the headline totals.

Jev at $0.042 per 1M input tokens, output free (OpenRouter, checked 2026-09-24). Input-size range: 50–2000 tokens per call.

// maintainers

Your repo is listed and you'd rather it wasn't, or a call is wrong?

Open an issue at https://github.com/0xjba/jev-swap and we'll remove it or correct it on the next build. We store only the repo name, commit, file and line, schema shape, model and token counts: never code or prompt text. To see real numbers for your project instead of estimates, run jev-swap shadow on your own traffic.