// open-source explorer

Decisions open-source code could run on Jev.

LLM calls in public repos that only return a label, a yes/no or a score, and what each could save in cost and time on TypeSafe Jev. Percentages only: traffic is unknown, and it cancels out of a percentage.

1,035public repos scanned
150with decision calls in production code
344decision calls found
44% · 3.6×median cost cut and speedup per decision call

Data as of 2026-09-24; prices and latency from OpenRouter. Where the code names its model and every field maps to Jev, the median is 31%; where the model is chosen at runtime, it's 44% against the least favourable likely model. How we calculate this · Download the data

// every repo

All repos with decision calls.

Well-known and less-known repos alike. Typical saving is the median across a repo's calls.

Sort by
RepoStarsCallsTypical saving
ariso-ai/ivan531
100%
kapoorankush/litclock661
99%
sepfazeli/due-diligence-rag141
99%
gauntletai-p4-pointer/foto-fun265
98%
Jellypod-Inc/cartoon-studio1203
98%
lilinji/GeneTind-Life-Skills122
98%
worldalliance/alliance101
98%
eersnington/diff0221
98%
Connectry-io/connectrylab-architect-cert-mcp342
97%
anymorph-ai/context-bench142
97%
Othmane-Khadri/YALC-the-GTM-operating-system3131
97%
kristianeboe/swipestats.io91
97%
ZealynxSecurity/krait221
96%
firecrawl/grok-4-fire-enrich511
96%
stakwork/stakgraph1123
95%
Codehagen/Autoselll1132
95%
jay-sahnan/signal3143
95%
HarimxChoi/google-surf-mcp2911
95%
llSourcell/mathvoice181
95%
typper-io/crust101
94%
ayuer/OptionFinder92
93%
GreamDesu/OpenDeepArxiv262
93%
fixadev/fixa-observe881
93%
firecrawl/fire-enrich1.3k1
92%
TranBaVinhSon/open-manus572
92%
CharlesQ9/HistAgent523
92%
whitew1994WW/email_research_assistant281
92%
KattyFury/Binance-Agent171
91%
different-ai/irs-agent262
91%
aravindpranav/job-agent392
89%
timothywarner-org/claude-architect872
89%
omer182/OverseerAgent331
83%
3SVS/simsa178
83%
elizaOS/eliza19.4k1
82%
meiotoufa/DR-Rubric254
81%
project-89/argOS384
80%
ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks7363
78%
XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code13.4k1
78%
firecrawl/open-lovable28.6k1
77%
tridant-io/owlette311
76%
unxversal/c3d152
76%
asteasolutions/tapestry-project121
74%
FNBIP/aegis-osint-map321
73%
inite-ai/inite-brain-service408
72%
rxtech-lab/hk-transportation-mcp81
72%
jorge-menjivar/super-agents431
66%
getmaxun/maxun17.6k2
61%
provos/ironcurtain6102
60%
watt-mind/coach913
59%
polarsource/polar10.3k4
59%
studie-tech/TheNinjaRPG1032
57%
TeneBrae93/HackSmarter_Swarm751
54%
open-mercato/open-mercato1.8k5
49%
activepieces/activepieces24.7k1
48%
cacheplane/threadplane641
48%
hotsuliakk/agentic-rag481
48%
sunnysavita10/doctor-appoitment-multiagent291
48%
RSametSamyeli/prompt-to-mobile-app-design101
48%
hnu-vis/TSPilot91
48%
kushalBanda/AI-Engineer91
48%
CaptainCrouton89/.claude4954
47%
autarch-dev/autarch272
45%
victorverma3/Letterboxd-Movie-Recommendations331
44%
subhadeeproy3902/cndocs251
44%
HKUDS/LightRAG39.8k1
44%
HUST-AI-HYZ/MemoryAgentBench4591
44%
theexperiencecompany/gaia3001
44%
lzlfwow/PatentClaw1091
44%
AQ-MedAI/MedMemoryBench751
44%
trustbit/erc3-agents472
44%
mesutdmn/Autonomous-Multi-Agent-Systems-with-CrewAI-Essay-Writer461
44%
muxx/bitgn-ecom1-exoskeleton433
44%
mahm/softwaredesign-llm-application361
44%
stanford-oval/sliders3115
44%
steelydylan/gut-cli291
44%
BasaltHQ/crm-official1315
44%
hepai-lab/hepai121
44%
ratel-ai/ratel-bench111
44%
infoslack/mentoria-ia-2025437
44%
567-labs/instructor13.9k1
42%
awslabs/threat-designer2882
41%
drfccv/deer-flow-cn2012
41%
wishonia/wishonia85
40%
vibrantlabsai/ragas15.8k2
39%
Arvo-AI/aurora4213
39%
sjtu-sai-agents/X-Master3221
39%
EuniAI/ContextBench1425
39%
Blackoutta/ai-engineer-training14111
39%
get-convex/convex-evals1281
39%
tangxiangru/Eigen-1931
39%
r-muresan/automated523
39%
Harmeet10000/AgentNexus-LangChain-FastAPI503
39%
mintlify/index491
39%
jesseduffield/ai-battlegrounds312
39%
activeloopai/hle_with_tools111
39%
kunwarVivek/mcp-github-project-manager1008
39%
tercumantanumut/selene1691
36%
growthxai/output4391
36%
resaro-ai/drone_vlm_golden_eval91
35%
firecrawl/firecrawl183.7k2
35%
wds1996/Tiny-Agent112
35%
BasedHardware/omi13.5k8
33%
google/artemis9.5k3
33%
FusionBrainLab/gigaevo-core1283
33%
modelguide/modelguide1071
33%
openai/openai-knowledge-retrieval961
33%
osnHQ/ethosai121
33%
cypherpepe/elizaOS1013
33%
orq-ai/evaluatorq211
30%
mouad-bounfil/Ai-Agents492
27%
iamarunbrahma/vision-parse4842
24%
alramalho/self-tracking-software332
23%
piyushgarg-dev/genai-cohort2121
21%
CodeLabsAI29/Inbox_OS122
20%
redmadrobot-rnd/dcd113
20%
allenai/olmocr19.7k1
17%
midday-ai/midday15.0k2
17%
masamasa59/genai-agent-advanced-book2064
17%
Akrasia0/liz292
13%
imbjdd/hackathonatlas.com191
11%
jaumpedro214/posts751
7%
kennethleungty/Handoffs-in-LangGraph-Multi-Agent-Systems131no saving
KATT/trpc-ai-playground231no saving
buffer121328/vibe-coding-and-agents136no saving
Hendrixer/agents-production901no saving
HomenShum/NodeBenchAI142no saving
csupenn/TopFlow141no saving
Y-66/AdaptiveRAG102no saving
latchfield/vulcan-core181no saving
drivly/ai391no saving
langchain-ai/open-swe10.8k1no saving
GLambard/MDxApp351no saving
piyushgarg-dev/genai-cohort-2.01031no saving
maevsi/vibetype432no saving
infoslack/curso-ia874no saving
Lakshay1509/NeatMail1456no saving
au-clan/cachesaver301no saving
Mail-0/Zero10.8k1no saving
exa-labs/exa-hallucination-detector3322no saving
brightdata/pepolehub3271no saving
lantos1618/github.gg981no saving
Hormold/tiktok-warmup591no saving
Rai220/gigachain_telegram_bot357no saving
revokslab/mentor.ai341no saving
lisstasy/Receipt_Scanner281no saving
CodinjaoftheWorld/agentic-ai-sdlc-hitl-langgraph152no saving
Draichi/formula1-AI131no saving
JohnZolton/patense-local81no saving
entbappy/AgentWriter-AI82no saving
mizuki0x/kamiyo-protocol81no saving

// methodology

How we calculate this.

Static estimates from each call's source, list prices and public latency stats. A shadow run on real traffic measures the real numbers.

llm_cost = (prompt_tokens + state_tokens) * llm_price_in + output_tokens * llm_price_out jev_cost = (jev_request_tokens + state_factor * state_tokens) * jev_price_in (Jev output tokens are free) reduction_all_jev = 1 - jev_cost / llm_cost
  • state_tokens (the user input each call sends) is unknown from source, so each figure is a range over 50-2000 tokens; the same count is used on both sides.
  • prompt_tokens counts only prompt text found in the call's source, without interpolated input. Prompts loaded from files or other modules are missed (promptInSource: false).
  • output_tokens is the smallest JSON the schema allows. Reasoning tokens, schema/tool definitions, tool-use system prompts and chat framing are left out of llm_cost, so llm_cost is a lower bound and the reduction is conservative.
  • jev_request_tokens = 259 + 31 per question, and state_factor = 0.71: Jev's billed input tokens, fitted from 45 live Jev calls on 2026-09-24 (jev-swap oss measure-jev).
  • Prices are list prices from OpenRouter (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models, fetched 2026-09-24); Jev's from its OpenRouter page. Calls whose model can't be read or isn't listed there are shown but left out of totals.
  • Only production code counts. Calls in tests, examples/demos/samples/docs/cookbooks/templates, evals/benchmarks/scripts/experiments, and in repositories that are sample collections are left out.
  • Calls that also return free-text fields Jev can't produce are 'partial-swap' and left out of totals: the LLM call would still be needed.
  • Absolute dollars are never shown: traffic volume is unknown, and it cancels out of a percentage.
  • Speed: the LLM's time for a call is estimated as OpenRouter's p50 latency plus output tokens / p50 throughput, from the model's busiest provider on its OpenRouter page (a 30-minute window at fetch time). Jev is taken at 327 ms, its p50 over 45 live calls measured end to end on 2026-09-24 (TypeSafe reports 70-500 ms).
  • Verdicts: 'cheaper' when Jev is at least 5% cheaper at the low end of the input range; 'about the same cost, faster' when within 15% of the LLM's cost and at least 1.5× faster; otherwise no saving.
  • Calls whose model is chosen at runtime are compared with likely models: ones the same repo names in its other decision calls, else the provider's small default models (data/reference-models.json: hand-picked, not usage data), which are also the cheapest, so the savings shown are the conservative ones. Only models where Jev is cheaper, or about the same cost and faster, are shown; these conditional figures stay out of the headline totals.

Jev at $0.042 per 1M input tokens, output free (OpenRouter, checked 2026-09-24). Input-size range: 50–2000 tokens per call.

// maintainers

Your repo is listed and you'd rather it wasn't, or a call is wrong?

Open an issue at https://github.com/0xjba/jev-swap and we'll remove it or correct it on the next build. We store only the repo name, commit, file and line, schema shape, model and token counts: never code or prompt text. To see real numbers for your project instead of estimates, run jev-swap shadow on your own traffic.